Public lands, regulation and policy affected by
nearly $4 billion deficit
This week at the Legislature, all eyes were on
appropriations committees as agencies presented the
results of an exercise they’d been tasked with by
the Legislature: reductions they would make if
ordered to reduce their budgets by 15%. In past
years, this has been an exercise that resulted in
some reductions but not the full 15%. However, this
year, with the state facing a nearly $4B shortfall,
this is likely to be more than just an exercise; and
with the high proportion of freshman members, there
is less familiarity than past years with the
importance of Florida’s environmental programs. Read
on for details and how you can lend your voice to
Florida’s imperiled natural resources. ~Audubon of
Florida Policy Team
DEP Proposes to Close 53 State Parks, Give Back
Three More
During
this exercise last year, the Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) proposed to close some parks to public
access to result in expense savings (this proposal was
not adopted). This year, the proposal includes an
unprecedented 53 state parks, which garner the
least attendance and do not have camping, despite being
economic engines in some of Florida’s smallest
and most rural communities. Additionally, the
proposal suggests that three parks—Egmont Key, Three
Rivers and Forest Capital—be returned to their primary
owners, whether or not those owners have the capacity to
manage them for conservation and public access.
Wednesday in the
House Agriculture and Natural Resources Appropriations
Committee, members seemed concerned but not willing
to simply remove these cuts from the table. One
suggested these lands should be sold to put them back on
county tax rolls. Another suggested enlisting
cash-strapped local governments to manage them. A third
suggested closing them “except on weekends.” Not only
does this proposal jeopardize public access to these
special places, but also it threatens their very well
being. Without staff to manage them, resources will
suffer from trespass, dumping, absence of prescribed
fire, and exotic species will run amok. See the list of
proposed park closures here. Have you visited any of
these parks? Are these some of the places you would
consider among
Florida’s Special Places? Tell us why these sites
are important to you, and
share that with your legislators too. The House
Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee and Senate
General Government Appropriations Committee will be the
first to consider which cuts they will accept.
Help
Keep the People's Parks Open!
Head over
to the
Florida's Special Places Facebook Page
and tell us how these parks are
important to you, personally! We need
you to speak up on
behalf of your parks -
let's see if we can get support for
each one.
Don't have
a Facebook Account? No problem! Email
your Special Places nominee to
FLConservation@Audubon.org. Tell us
how each of these threatened
parks is important to you and your
community. Florida's public lands need
your voice!
Forward this email to your friends,
family and co-workers so they can stay
up-to-date with the threat to our State
Parks.
Other State Lands Also Under Threat
While
State Parks are some of our highest profile state lands,
they are not the only ones proposed for massive
reductions. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission’s proposals included an $8 million reduction
in funding for invasive plant management, a $2 million
reduction in the agency’s already whisper-thin land
management budget, and the elimination of 169 wildlife
law enforcement officers, just to name a few. Additional
DEP reductions eliminate the Florida Springs
Initiative’s Environmental Assessment and Restoration
funding; eliminate eight full-time employees and OPS
staff from the Division of State Lands, who oversee our
public trust lands; closes six aquatic preserve offices
statewide; and eliminates 17 state park police positions
to name a few. The Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services chose not to present this week, to
give its new Secretary more time to review the budget
and propose reductions. More detailed accounts can be
found in the committee packet,
located here.
Wildlife in the Crosshairs?
With a steady anti-regulation drumbeat growing louder
in the Capitol, committees this week raised concerns
about wildlife protections stifling development. In the
Senate General Government Appropriations Committee
Wednesday, senators responded to a presentation on the
Fish and Wildlife Commission’s (FWC) new imperiled
species rule with probing questions about regulations
surrounding black bears and gopher tortoises. In the
House Agriculture and Natural Resources Appropriations
Committee that same day, Chairwoman Trudi Williams
(R-Ft. Myers) suggested that Florida panthers no
longer warranted endangered status and
Representative Frank Artiles (R-Miami) asked FWC
director Nick Wiley how much money the agency spends on
panther protection in these tough economic times.
Florida Forever and Everglades Restoration
In the House Finance & Tax Committee, the State
Division of Bond Finance presented to the committee an
update on the state’s degree of indebtedness, or
debt ratio, noting that recovering tax revenues have
been improving the outlook. However, the state’s debt
ratio is not projected to fall below the 7%
threshold set by legislators until after 2012.
Many legislators flag debt as their objection to
using a fixed-rate loan program like bonding to acquire
more land. The presentation by the State Division of
Bond Finance clearly articulated that environmental
programs are only a small portion of our state
debt - 56% of Florida’s debt is from education bonding,
another 27% from transportation. Environmental bonding,
which includes land acquisition, is only 10% of the
state’s indebtedness…and a good bet
given the tendency for land prices to rise over the
long-term.
In today’s economy, some remarkable land
bargains are available to the state. If only the
Legislature can find a way to appropriate continuation
funding needed by both Florida Forever
and Everglades Restoration, like they
did in 2010.
Senate Ponders Rolling Back Septic Tank Rules
On Wednesday, the Senate Environmental Preservation
and Conservation Committee considered a draft bill to
reverse the mandatory septic tank inspection and
replacement program put into effect last year. The
original law has drawn angry criticism from septic tank
owners who don’t want to pay for inspections and pump
outs. Many legislators have taken their side. A
compromise is likely that focuses on inspections only in
basins with already polluted waterways. According to the
Department of Health, there are more than 2.6 million
septic systems in Florida but less than 1 percent --
about 17,000 -- are being inspected and serviced by
licensed maintenance professionals. In most cases,
septic systems are only checked or serviced when
residents notice they have failed. The lifespan of a
system is 20-30 years; more than half of the state's
septic systems are at least 30 years old. For
more on this issue, read coverage by the
St. Petersburg Times.
House Water Committee Takes Testimony on Water
Supply
Thursday, the new House Select Committee on Water
Resources started down the potentially controversial
path of considering changes to state water policy.
Audubon of Florida Executive Director Eric Draper was
invited to sit on the Committee’s panel of experts on
the topic of water quantity. He told Legislators that
Florida’s water laws are the best in the nation from the
point of view of protecting the environment, and that
water supplies could be restored by rehydrating
wetlands and aquifers.
Read Audubon's written comments to the committee chair
here.
The Committee will consider water quality issues at
its next meeting (two weeks from today) and conduct
public hearings over the summer. Audubon will work to
enlist our members and allies in improving water policy
for the benefit of the environment. Be sure to check the
Audubon of Florida News Blog often for the latest on
our state's water policy.
03 March 2010
2010 Legislative Wrap up
2010 Legislative Update
March 3, 2010
1000 Friends is
monitoring a series of proposals for the 2010 legislative session.
We are paying particular attention to efforts to reauthorize the
Florida Department of Community Affairs. Unsurprisingly, we expect
budget issues to be hot topics as well, including funding for DCA,
Florida Forever, and affordable housing. At present, Legislative
leaders are vowing they will pass no major growth management
legislation this session. This appears to be in large part due to
concerns about the November 2010 elections, during which many
legislators will be up for re-election and Florida Hometown
Democracy will be on the ballot.
Here are some of the issues 1000 Friends is closely following as the
2010 session starts. We will send updates as the session progresses:
DCA Sunset Review—The Florida Department of
Community Affairs is going through the Sunset Review process that
each state agency undergoes every ten years. This year the
legislature has the option of continuing DCA, or abolishing it and
repealing, revising or reassigning its functions. At present, the
sentiment in the legislature appears to be to take no action this
year, postponing a decision until 2011. 1000 Friends and others
support efforts to have the DCA affirmatively reauthorized this
session.
HB 665 (Aubuchon) Relating to Affordable Housing –1000
Friends and other housing advocates strongly support this bill as
drafted. In brief, it: (1) repeals the cap on Sadowski Affordable
Housing Trust Funds, and (2) limits use of funds through July 1,
2011, so that NO new construction occurs (this is meant to focus on
helping people buy down the backlog of existing vacant units). Visit
the Florida Housing Coalition's website for
more information.
Florida Forever—Governor Charlie Crist has included
in his budget a $4.8 million dollar appropriation for Florida
Forever. This will lead to $50 million in bonds to allow the
acquisition of sensitive natural lands through the Florida Forever
program. 1000 Friends applauds Gov. Crist for his leadership on this
issue. 1000 Friends and its partner Florida Forever Coalition
members support this budget item. Visit the Florida Forever
Coalition's website for
more information.
Citizen Bill of Rights—1000 Friends is calling for
adoption of a Citizen Bill of Rights. This would include
requirements for a supermajority vote of the elected body for all
plan amendment changes; a mandatory citizen participation plan and
workshops conducted by any developer seeking a land use change; a
“cooling off” period preventing last minute changes to plans before
public meetings to allow the public, staff and elected officials
time for informed deliberation; preservation of citizen standing
status throughout any appeal process; and citizen protection from
SLAPP suits associated with any participation in the comprehensive
planning process. 1000 Friends has drafted bill language and is
seeking sponsors.
SB 568 (Constantine) Relating to the Florida Springs Protection
Act—At present, this is a “shell bill” meaning no language
is attached to it. 1000 Friends anticipates that language comparable
to last year’s unsuccessful springs legislation will be inserted,
and will support such legislation.
Senate Joint Resolution 1180 (Negron)—This proposed
constitutional ballot initiative creates a new Section 28 of Article
10 of the Constitution, requiring the election of members to
governing boards that have the ability to adopt millage rates. 1000
Friends is concerned about this provision because it would mean that
special interests could help fund election campaigns for Water
Management District board members and others.
Alternative Review (no bill number)—A proposal is
circulating for a landowner-driven bill to establish an alternative
review process for development projects on parcels of 100,000 acres
or more that are located in more than one county. Conceptually, the
Department of Community Affairs would initiate a Sector Planning
Process for such parcels, in which DCA would review and approve the
conceptual plan, subsequently review and approve detailed Special
Area Plans, and review and approve local government land development
regulations for consistency. Problematic provisions include the
vesting of water rights, generous density bonuses, and unclear
infrastructure requirements. Both DCA and 1000 Friends have
expressed concerns about this proposal as drafted.
Jobs Bill (no bill number)—The Gates Committee’s
Jobs Bill has a few provisions that relate to comprehensive
planning. Section 30 of the Draft Committee Bill by the Select
Committee on Florida’s Economy includes a provision to extend
development permits for an additional two years as an economic
stimulus measure. 1000 Friends and others do not oppose this
provision. However, more controversial is a provision in Section 30
related to last year’s SB 360, which is facing a legal challenge.
This provision would allow DRI’s and plan amendments applied for
under the provisions of SB 360 to remain in effect, regardless of
the outcome of the legal challenge.
HB 733 (Sands) Relating to Required Ads and Public Meetings—This
bill requires additional neighborhood public meetings as called for
by 1000 Friends in its Citizen Bill of Rights. As drafted, the bill
calls for public hearings on development orders as well as plan
amendments.
SB 2078 (Bennett) Relating to Platted Lots/Pilot Program—This
establishes a pilot program to give credits for consolidating
antiquated lots or transferring their development rights. While 1000
Friends agrees with the concept, some of the specific provisions are
problematic.
SB 1742 (Bennett) Relating to Growth Management—This
specifies that SB 360 automatically removes transportation
concurrency requirements. This runs counter to DCA’s interpretation
of SB 360 that the local government decides whether or not to remove
the concurrency requirements.
***************************************
This message was sent by 1000 Friends of Florida
Please report any misuse of this email alert to friends@1000fof.org